Asphalt Mix Design Mix Design Platform Auto-saved Asphalt Mix Design Suite
1
Project + Customer
Identification & details
2
Gradation
Mix & sieve blend
3
Marshall
OBC + graphs
4
Rejuvenator dosage
RAP / dosage calculator
5
Confirmatory
Final OBC test
6
Print Report
Generate & print
Auto-saved in this browser
📄
Project identification
Details that appear on the JMF report header and all exported documents.
Required
Required
🏠
Customer details
Required
Step 1 of 6
🔧
Mix specification
Auto-detected from your location.
Required
Sets the Marshall design duty — blows, stability, air-void target & binder.
Mix type list narrows automatically to dense-graded or SMA based on this choice.
Aggregate Physical Properties
Enter Gsb, Gsa and test values. Combined Gsb (weighted average) drives all volumetric calculations. MoRTH 500-17 limits verified automatically.
⚡ KEY INPUT
⚡ KEY INPUT
External mineral filler & Hydrated Lime (optional, up to 2)
e.g. hydrated lime, cement, fly ash — 100% passing 0.075 mm. Choose the number of fillers, then enter each filler's Type and Dosage % (by total mix weight) here, and its Gsb, Gsa & Water absorption in the Filler rows of the aggregate properties table below. These feed the Combined Gsb (+ filler) display and the blending-matrix filler column automatically.
BinFractionGsb (bulk)Gsa (apparent)Water abs. (%)AIV (%)FI+EI (%)PSVLoose unit wt
(kg/m³)
Rodded unit wt
(kg/m³)
Combined Gsb (bins + RAP)
2.665
Combined Gsb (+ filler)
Weighted harmonic mean of cold bins + RAP (if active in blending matrix). With filler = includes external filler Gsb at its entered dosage. Used in VMA calculation per MoRTH 500-17.
💧
Binder Properties
VG-40: min 35
VG-40: min 50°C
VG-40: 3200–4800
Additives
NMAS — Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size & RAP Source Data
Select the NMAS. Toggle RAP to enter RAP-1 and RAP-2 gradation data inline — these are included automatically in the blending table and AI Autoblend optimisation.
37.5mm
26.5mm
19mm
13.2mm
9.5mm
4.75mm
⚡ KEY INPUT
Include RAP-1 and RAP-2 in gradation blending Adds RAP fractions with their own % passing and dosage in Table 1
Manual sieve selection
These sieve sizes drive the blend table (Table 1) and the gradation curve. They start from the active standard set — edit any size or limit, or add / remove a sieve. The table, chart and Auto-Gradation all follow your selection.
#Sieve size (mm)Lower limit (%)Upper limit (%)
📊
Sieve Analysis & Blend Proportions — Blending Matrix
Enter % passing for each cold bin and RAP source. The Blending % columns compute automatically. Combined grading is checked against the active spec band — green = pass, red = fail.
Total: 100.00%
Include in blending matrix: RAP: tick once for 1 source, then tick "+2nd" for a second • Filler Gsb flows into Combined Gsb • dosages are fixed; only cold bin %s are optimised by Auto Blend
🔢
VMA Requirement Check & Calculation
Parameter Value / Input Notes
NMAS (mm) Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size — governs minimum VMA
Design Air Voids Va (%) Target air voids at design compaction — typically 3–5% (Marshall)
Binder Sp. Gravity Gb VG-30 ≈ 1.03 · VG-40 ≈ 1.04 · PMB ≈ 1.00–1.02
Bitumen Content Pb (% mix) % of total mix by weight — enter OBC from Marshall sheet
Measured Gmb (optional) Leave 0 to compute from Va — enter lab value to use measured Gmb
▹ Aggregate Bulk Specific Gravity (Gsb) — one input per blend component
NMAS (mm) Min VMA @ Va=3% Min VMA @ Va=4% Min VMA @ Va=5%
9.514%15%16%
13.213%14%15%
19.012%13%14%
26.511%12%13%
37.510%11%12%
Formula: Gsb = 100/Σ(Pᵢ/Gᵢ) • Gmm = 100/(Ps/Gsb + Pb/Gb) • Gmb = Gmm×(1−Va/100) or measured • VMA = 100−(Gmb×Ps)/Gsb • Illustrative min-VMA values (Marshall/MS-2) — verify against governing spec.
BLENDING CHART — DBM Grade II
Combined Grading vs MoRTH 500-17 Specification Band  |  Logarithmic sieve scale (0.01 – NMAS mm)
Figure 1 — BLENDING CHART  |  Sieve Size (mm) log scale   |   % Passing (y-axis 0–100)
Step 2 of 6
🔬
Confirmatory Test — Marshall Test for Mix @ Optimum Binder Content
As per MS-2, ASTM D 1559. Enter specimen weights (Air, Water, SSD), ring reading and flow for each replicate. All volumetric properties are auto-calculated.
Laboratory: Type of Mix: Laying Chainage: Date of Casting: Date of Testing:
Grade of Bitumen: Sp.Gr. of Bitumen (Gb): Apparent Sp.Gr. Mix (Gsa): Bulk Sp.Gr. Mix (Gsb): Effective Sp.Gr. (Gse): P.Ring Correction Factor (CF): 1 div =
kN
Number of trial binder contents: 3 replicate specimens per trial (as per MS-2 / MoRTH)
Gmb = A / (C - B)  [Bulk Sp.Gr.; A=wt in air, B=wt in water, C=wt SSD]
Va (%) = ((Gmm - Gmb) / Gmm) × 100  [Air Voids; Gmm from AASHTO T-209]
VMA (%) = 100 - ((Gmb × (100 - Pb)) / Gsb)  [Voids Mineral Aggregate]
Vb (%) = 100 - Va - VMA = VFB × VMA / 100  [Voids Filled Bitumen: target 65-75%]
Stability (kN) = Ring Reading (div) × Ring Factor (kN/div) × Correction Factor
Marshall Quotient (MQ) = Stability / Flow  |  OBC = Average of 4 criteria (MS-2 §4.5)
BITUMINOUS MIX PROPERTIES BY MARSHALL METHOD — BC Grade-2 (As per MS-2 / ASTM D-2726)   n = Percent by weight of total loose mixture = 100
Aggregate bins:
Sample
No.
% Bitumen
by wt of mix
Pb
Wt of Specimen (gms) Volume of Specimen D=(C-B) Bulk Sp.Gr. Gmb=(A/D) Gmm VIM
(%)
3-5
VMA
(%)
≥13
VFB
(%)
65-75
STABILITY (kN) Flow
(mm)
2-4
Marshall
Quotient
In Air
A
In Water
B
In SSD
C
VIM = ((Gmm-Gmb)/Gmm)*100 VMA = 100-((Gmb*(100-Pb))/Gsb) VFB = ((VMA-VIM)/VMA)*100 Proving Ring
Reading
F
Marshall Stability G=(F*CF) kN Correction
H
Corrected Stability I=(G*H) kN
gms gms gms 3-5 ≥12 65-75 div kN 1 div=0.033 kN kN
AVG =
Blue = Gmb & Volume auto-calculated (A, B, C entered). Green = VIM, VMA, VFB auto-calculated. Yellow = Marshall Stability G = Proving Ring Reading (F) × Correction Factor (CF); Corrected Stability I = G × Correction (H). AVG = mean of 3 replicates per binder content; Grand AVG = mean of all binder contents @ OBC.
Table 2A — Marshall Test Results Summary (for OBC determination)
Direct Entry Mode When lab raw weights are unavailable — enter Gmb, Gmm, Va, Stability, Flow, VMA, VFA directly to compute OBC.
Figure 2 — Marshall Property Curves (6-Panel): Binder Content vs Volumetric Properties
Based on average values. OBC marked with ★. Spec limits in grey dashed. Per Asphalt Institute MS-2 (7th Ed.) / ASTM D 1559.
Bulk Density Gmb (g/cc) vs Binder Content (%)
Air Voids Va (%) vs Binder Content (%)
VMA (%) vs Binder Content (%)
VFB / VFA (%) vs Binder Content (%)
Corrected Stability (kN) vs Binder Content (%)
Marshall Flow (mm) vs Binder Content (%)
OBC Calculation — Asphalt Institute MS-2 Four-Point Method
CriterionBC at criterion (%)Source
BC at maximum Bulk Density (Gmb)From Gmb vs BC curve peak
BC at Va = 4.0% (design air voids)Linear interpolation
BC at mid-VFB range (70%)Linear interpolation
BC at maximum Corrected StabilityFrom Stability vs BC curve peak
OBC = Average of four criteriaMS-2 §4.5 / ASTM D 1559
Enter Marshall data above to calculate OBC.
OBC
% by wt mix
Stability @ OBC
kN
Va @ OBC
%
VFB @ OBC
%
Figure 3 — OBC Narrow Band Graph: Binder Content Range Satisfying ALL Five Criteria Simultaneously
Pass = criteria met. Green bar = all 5 criteria pass simultaneously. Optimum Binder Content range identified.
Step 3 of 6
Enable RAP in the Gradation step to design rejuvenator dosage here.
Step 4 of 6
Confirmatory Marshall Test — Mix at Optimum Binder Content
Prepare three specimens at the optimum binder content found on the Marshall sheet and confirm the volumetric and strength properties meet the specification. For a RAP mix the binder is split into fresh binder + RAP binder + rejuvenator.
Confirmatory Marshall Test Sheet (MS-2 / ASTM D 1559 format)
Two samples (replicates), three specimens each, prepared at the optimum binder content. Enter the weights, Gmm, stability dial reading (F), proving-ring correction factor (I) and flow; the sheet computes D, Gmb, Va, VMA, VFB, corrected stability and Marshall Quotient, with per-sample and overall averages — in the standard laboratory format.
Number of samples (replicates) at OBC: up to 3 samples — each with 3 specimens
Gmb = A/D where D = C−B (volume of specimen). Va = (Gmm−Gmb)/Gmm×100. VMA = 100−Gmb(100−Pb)/Gsb. VFB = (VMA−Va)/VMA×100. Corrected stability J = H×I where H = F×Fa (proving-ring factor). MQ = J/Flow.
🔳
ITS / TSR Performance Testing
Run on specimens prepared at the confirmatory optimum binder content — moisture-susceptibility and strength retention properties of the confirmed mix.
Min. 500 kPa
24 hr soak @ 60°C
MoRTH 500-17: min 80% TSR
Min. 80%
📋
Confirmatory Result vs Specification (overall average)
PropertyS1 avgS2 avgS3 avgOverall avgSpec limitStatus
📊
Confirmatory Compliance Chart
🏆
Final Approved Mix Design
🏭
Plant Bin Proportioning — Cold Feed Bins & Hot Screens
Cold-feed bin dosages come from the gradation blend. The hot-bin split is read from the combined gradation at each screen: only material passing the top screen is used; oversize retained on the top screen overflows and is discarded. Hot-bin draw %s are balanced to reproduce the final mix design.
Cold feed bins (auto from gradation)
Asphalt plant hot bins — by screen deck
Hot-bin split is read from the combined aggregate gradation at each screen size.
Step 5 of 6
📄
JMF Report
Complete Steps 1–5 to review your mix design summary.
Step 6 of 6